<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.3.3">Jekyll</generator><link href="https://blog.jez.io/feed/rubocop.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="https://blog.jez.io/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2026-01-21T18:17:55-05:00</updated><id>https://blog.jez.io/feed/rubocop.xml</id><title type="html">Jake Zimmerman | Rubocop</title><subtitle>A collection of blog posts about programming, software, types, programming languages, Sorbet, Vim, Markdown, and more.</subtitle><author><name>Jake Zimmerman</name></author><entry><title type="html">What would a type-aware Rubocop look like?</title><link href="https://blog.jez.io/type-aware-rubocop/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What would a type-aware Rubocop look like?" /><published>2022-05-16T16:17:20-04:00</published><updated>2022-05-16T16:17:20-04:00</updated><id>https://blog.jez.io/type-aware-rubocop</id><author><name>Jake Zimmerman</name></author><category term="sorbet" /><category term="ruby" /><category term="rubocop" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[From time to time, someone asks, "Would Sorbet ever allow defining some sort of type-aware lint rules?" My answer has usually been "no," for a couple of reasons.]]></summary></entry></feed>